Record type <str> has conflicting CDD definitions

  Explanation:  Two relations from different  databases  have  the
  same  name.   Normally,  the  preprocessor  disambiguates  these
  relations by prefixing their names  with  the  database  handle.
  However,  when  the databases come from CDD and the converter is
  generating references to the  data  dictionary,  the  dictionary
  chooses  the  names  which  will  be used to refer to a relation
  structured type.  CDD will not choose unique names,  hence  your
  program will not compile.

  User Action:  If the relation referred  to  by  the  message  is
  identical to the relation which was declared (perhaps because it
  came from a different link to the same database),  then  nothing
  needs to be done.  If the relation is different you will have to
  take steps to  disambiguate  the  Orelation  names  yourself  or
  re-translate using the /NOCDD_NAMES switch.